1Sky: logo

Sign up for our
alerts & newsletters


RSS RSS | What is RSS?

The Skywriter - 1Sky's Blog


Senators McCain & Obama: we need clean energy, not "clean coal"


Posted by: Gillian Caldwell | October 3, 2008

Last night in the Vice Presidential debate, you heard both Senator Biden and Governor Palin touting their support for "clean coal".  Today, President Bush signed a $700 "bailout" bill passed by Congress that provides important tax credit extensions for renewable energy and energy efficiency measures--but also gives $25 billion in tax credits to the coal industry.

Both presidential campaigns and our Congress are missing the point:  Conventional coal-burning power plants are the leading cause of global warming pollution in the United States.

"Clean Coal" is a myth--a contradiction in terms.  Coal companies claim they can develop coal plants at some point in the distant future that will capture and sequester carbon pollution.  But carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is unproven and exorbitantly expensive.  At best, the technology will not be commercially available until 2030, and installing carbon capture systems will almost double plant costs, which won't provide any relief to Americans' soaring utility bills. We need real solutions, not coal industry myths.  Send a message to both Presidential campaigns that we need clean, green energy now.

The recent firestorm of attention in the media on the "Clean Coal" red herring, which has been fanned by attacks and rebuttals from both Presidential campaigns, began two weeks ago when a 1Sky organizer in Ohio, Carolyn Auwaerter, asked Biden a simple question based on 1Sky's commitment to moving beyond coal. "Senator," she asked,  "Wind and solar are flourishing here in Ohio, so why are you supporting clean coal?" Biden clearly and directly stated "We're not supporting 'clean coal'… No coal plants here in America!" 

But he went on to argue for exporting Clean Coal technology to export to China, claiming it was necessary because several new coal plants are being built each week in China, with pollution impacting us here in the United States.  You can see the Biden exchange here.  The McCain-Palin ticket has been an even more vocal advocate of coal as a solution to our energy crisis.

Both campaigns need to hear us loud and clear: the solution to our climate crisis and our staggering economy is not more business as usual.  It is a clean, green 21st century economy that provides jobs in the growing wind, solar, and geothermal industries. 

Thousands of Americans spanning every state in the country hosted over 675 events this past Saturday, September 27th demonstrating their support for Green Jobs Now!  But we need to make our message even louder.

Please, take a minute now to send a message to both Presidential campaigns that we need clean green energy now.

We need federal policy that will:

  • Enact an immediate moratorium on new coal-fired power plants that emit global warming pollution;
  • Repower America through smart, renewable energy such as solar, wind and geothermal;
  • Set strong, science-based targets for the reduction of global warming emissions of at least 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, and at least 80% below 1990 levels by 2050;
  • Create 5 million new green jobs and pathways out of poverty with a sweeping national mobilization for climate solutions and investment in a new energy economy.

Thank you for your commitment to real solutions!

Categories:


Add a comment »

Comments

November 10, 2008
4:21 AM

Robot said:

With the recent explosion in crude oil and natural gas prices, analysts are no longer wondering if coal prices will catch up but when. There are still many opponents to coal, mainly environmentalists, and the term "clean coal" still remains an oxymoron to most people.

October 4, 2008
8:43 AM

Debbie Barr said:

Stop soft peddling the coal industry by calling it clean energy. It is not. You are mistaken if you think we, the public, cannot see through this endorsement as a lobbyist paid statement.

October 4, 2008
10:58 AM

Michael S. said:

Debbie -- Where are you reading that? Gillian's very point in this post is that no form of coal can be considered to be clean energy or called clean energy.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Inline assets are allowed.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image without spaces, also respect upper and lower case.