1Sky: logo

Sign up for our
alerts & newsletters


RSS RSS | What is RSS?

The Skywriter - 1Sky's Blog


The House must act NOW on cap-and-trade legislation


Posted by: Gillian Caldwell | January 9, 2009

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said this week that she has enough votes to pass cap-and-trade legislation aimed at curbing the effects of global warming, but would not commit to holding a vote in 2009. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Pelosi said she has backing in the Democratic-controlled House to move a cap-and-trade bill, but will not force the issue. When Congressman Ed Markey, since identified as the new Chairman of the new Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment in the Energy and Commerce Committee, was approached on timing, he said “to be determined.”

People close to Pelosi and Markey told me not to read too much into the remarks -- they said the stimulus is the priority now, and Congress is waiting for the nod from the incoming President on timing. But as Speaker Pelosi and Representative Markey know better than most, we need leadership now! It will never be easy. If we wait, passing legislation that will solve our climate and energy problems will only get harder. Solving the greatest threat to the planet must be the priority. The time is now. We need to push bold solutions and cannot compromise before Congress has even started doing anything to try to repower, refuel and rebuild. We have a committed president-elect with brilliant climate advisors. We have a House leader with a history of commitment to this issue from a district that is well educated on global warming’s dangers.

In addition to bold action by Speaker Pelosi, we are urging House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) to take the lead in 2009 on a climate bill. 1Sky has over 350 organizational allies nationwide, will be funding 25 organizers spanning twenty states this year, and has already recruited voluntary Climate Precinct Captains in over 150 Congressional districts. We are amassing ground troops. We’re ready. We need Congress to lead. This is never going to be an easy lift. But it needs to be done now. We have decades of polluting to make up for and no time to lose -- with catastrophic impacts looming and a clean, green economy to embrace in the face of our worst recession in decades.

Meanwhile, Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member and fossil fuel fan Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.) was quoted on Monday as saying that the folks who want us dependent on oil and coal forever think the momentum is on their side. Let’s prove them wrong. Sign up to become a Climate Precinct Captain now!

Categories:


Add a comment »

Comments

January 9, 2009
11:47 PM

Jeff said:

Dr. James Hansen says cap-and-trade won't work to curb climate change. Can we get some background on why 1Sky is supporting it?

January 10, 2009
11:45 AM

Jeff said:

I've contacted my Congressmen on this. I'm also aware that Dr. James Hansen believes cap-and-trade won't lead to CO2 reductions on the scale and timeframe needed. His evidence is that countries promoting cap-and-trade are still planning to build coal-fired power plants. Could we have more info about why 1Sky supports cap-and-trade? Thanks!

January 10, 2009
10:21 PM

Jeff said:

I sent my Congressmen a message as suggested. I'm also aware that 1Sky ally Dr. James Hansen believes that cap-and-trade won't work. Could we please have some links or something to pro/con on both sides to learn more? Thanks!

January 10, 2009
11:29 PM

Thomas Miner said:

Pelosi is using the stimulus as a stall tactic, when in reality a cap and trade system would be one of the best solutions to long term recovery put on the table. She was declared a "revolutionary" leader in the house, but so far her constituents have not received what was advertised.

January 10, 2009
11:33 PM

Thomas said:

Pelosi should cash in her political capital now and call the vote on cap-and-trade. So far she has been far less effective that what she was advertised to be.

January 11, 2009
6:36 PM

Annie Wilson said:

Gillian

We the people and most environmental organizations, scientists, economists, educators and elected officials must quickly become informed about cap and tax vs. cap and trade. Why support what is known to be the least effective mechanism for CO2 reduction? I agree with you that we have no time to loose. It doesn't make any logical sense to trust and risk Wall Street as the CO2 middleman. A simple CO2 cap and tax system is a much more efficient system to raise the revenue we need for CO2 reductions and financing investments into green jobs and a green economy.

The existing subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear must be phased out ASAP, this could also become another form of revenue.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Inline assets are allowed.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.